THE
|
Article from Special Issue Vol. 45, No. 529, January 1975 ISRAEL: LAND OF PROMISE Pages 47-51 |
Home |
About
| Subscriptions |
Contact us |
Search
New this month |
Back issues
| Books |
Other
sites | Special Issue index
Back to Special Issue contents
“INSTEAD OF THE BRIER...”
RON A. HILL (UNICEF)
TABLES AND CHARTS of growth can never replace the great privilege of seeing development expand over the years. The writer was in Israel from February to June, 1945, travelling extensively and making contacts with a number of firms and organisations. It was a fascinating experience. Return visits were made in 1947, 1954 and 1960. Marked changes were observed, and helpful continuity was provided by discussions with many friends made in 1945. The effect of the great diversity of human skills and wisdom brought to Israel with the return of Jewry from all quarters of the earth was noted with astonishment. From die distant past came the Word of the Lord through the Scriptures supporting what was seen and heard.
The agricultural scene was especially striking. For centuries the land had been neglected; it had become an almost empty desert—a harsh contrast with the time of Moses and the report of those twelve men who searched out the land as recorded in Numbers 13. It was then the time of the first-ripe grapes, and they “cut down a branch with one cluster, and bare it between two upon a staff”. They brought also pomegranates and figs, and told Moses and the people, “We came unto the land whither thou sentest us, and surely it floweth with milk and honey; and this is the fruit of it”.
It is interesting to note that early Jewish settlements of the 1850 period took up the cultivation of grapes. Later came the growing of citrus fruits and this was the first major export commodity. David Horowitz in The Enigma of Economic Growth says: “During the two decades 1950-70 Israel underwent an unprecedented economic expansion: the curve of economic activity rose steeply and the pace of development was unusually rapid. This phenomenon in an area of a few thousand square miles can only be explained by some peculiar array of circumstances. The crucial issue is whether it has its source in external or in internal conditions, although obviously each category of conditions reacts on the other and their inter-ratios are constantly changing”.
We go to the Bible for the explanation: “Oh Lord”, pleads the prophet, “Revive Thy work in the midst of the years,... in wrath remember mercy” (Hab. 3:2). And that is what has happened. Here is the unseen external force—the Spirit of God—which many have forgotten; it has a major bearing on the increase in citrus fruit production—272,700 tons in 1948/49 to 1,513,500 tons in 1970/71. If in times past the God of Israel could, in one year, provide His people with a harvest that would enable them to give the land a rest in the seventh year, this same land, with this unseen blessing, can surely bring forth plentifully after the years of desolation, as a prelude to that time still to come when the ploughman shall overtake the reaper because of the abundance of the harvest. He has permitted modern Israel to help :
|
“Agriculture is probably the most highly planned sector in the economy. Israeli agriculture has attained a technical efficiency rivalling that in many other countries. It has long been accorded special treatment as reflected in the quality of resources diverted to it, both because of social consideration—revamping of the occupational structure of the Jewish people with its return to the soil—and because of the policy of achieving the greatest possible measure of self-sufficiency in food supply. And indeed, in several branches, it now meets all domestic needs—fruit and vegetables, poultry and eggs, milk and dairy produce—and even exports part of the yield. As to grains, much of the requirement is still imported and it appears that Israel will have to continue obtaining most of it from overseas, as climatic and soil conditions do not make the cultivation very viable. But there, too, yields have risen a great deal; in a good year, the wheat crop for example can supply more than half the domestic demand. The efficiency of our farming is a tribute, inter alia, to the achievement of considerable economies in production and marketing; on the one hand, the co-operative use of costly implements and equipment and regional and national irrigation networks, and, on the other, the marketing of produce through co-operative channels” (Facts about Israel). |
For the period 1948/49 to 1970/71 we reproduce below two tables from Facts about Israel. Table No. 1 indicates the increase in use of land, and Table No. 2 the average increase in agricultural yield of selected items.
|
TABLE No. 1 |
|||
|
CULTIVATED AREA (In thousand acres) |
|||
| 1948/49 | 1959/60 | 1971/72 | |
|
Field Crops |
273 |
720 |
811 |
| Vegetables, Potatoes and Melons | 26 | 66 | 57 |
| Orchards | 89 | 180 | 209 |
| Fishponds | 4 | 12 | 12 |
| Miscellaneous | 20 | 40 | 39 |
|
___ |
_____ |
_____ |
|
| TOTAL | 412 | 1,018 | 1,128 |
| Thereof : Irrigated | 75 | 326 | 480 |
|
TABLE No. 2 |
||||
|
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION—SELECTED ITEMS In tons, unless otherwise designated |
||||
|
|
1948/49 |
1958/59 |
1969/70 |
1970/71 |
Citrus Fruit |
272,700 |
587,600 |
1,261,900 |
1,513,500 |
Grapes (table and wine) |
17,800 |
57,800 |
60,700 |
66,600 |
Olives |
10,700 |
8,000 |
6,600 |
12,500 |
Bananas |
3,500 |
31,600 |
61,150 |
56,300 |
Other Fruit |
7,200 |
42,000 |
162,800 |
172,300 |
Wheat |
21,200 |
73,700 |
125,000 |
199,500 |
Barley and Oats |
20,900 |
66,000 |
13,600 |
17,600 |
Sorghum |
3,000 |
40,700 |
10,900 |
20,600 |
Hay |
40,600 |
123,100 |
137,300 |
141,200 |
Green Fodder and Silage |
372,800 |
1,534,300 |
1,479,100 |
1,383,000 |
Groundnuts |
300 |
15,300 |
18,700 |
21,200 |
Cotton Lint |
— |
7,300 |
35,300 |
36,700 |
Cottonseed |
— |
12,250 |
55,000 |
59,000 |
Tobacco |
600 |
2,400 |
1,600 |
1,100 |
Sugar Beet |
— |
122,100 |
237,000 |
258,600 |
Vegetables, Potatoes and Melons |
11,900 |
441,900 |
740,900 |
765,300 |
Poultry Meat |
5,040 |
40,650 |
101,700 |
124,200 |
Cattle Meat |
2,010 |
18,900 |
35,600 |
36,500 |
Fish |
3,500 |
13,200 |
21,800 |
26,100 |
Milk (kilolitres) |
85,950 |
300,800 |
487,700 |
497,500 |
Eggs (thousands) |
242,500 |
1,027,000 |
1,320,000 |
1,423,200 |
In The Enigma of Economic Growth David Horowitz, analysing agricultural development, says:
“Thus, an export-minded, highly mechanised, computer-guided and planned agriculture is seen to display an impressive gamut of prospects for stepping up productivity if the requisite inputs of capital and skill can be counted on. With modern technology, there is no doubt that farm production can be quickly even spectacularly enlarged. Israel’s experience is of particular interest because the successes were won by a population that was overwhelmingly untutored in agriculture and had to undergo an occupational reshuffle in an arid country with few natural resources and little water. Success was achieved principally by applying capital, know-how, and science. The value of production per employed person rose in real terms by over 238 per cent from 1955 to 1970 and its average is now ten times higher than in developing countries as well as higher than in France, West Germany, or Japan. On one million acres with only 10.5 per cent of the population engaged in farming, foodstuffs are produced for 85 per cent of nearly three million consumers and, on top of that, nutritional standards have improved considerably and farm produce worth $140 million is shipped or flown to overseas markets. In some branches, such as milk and cotton, Israel can claim the highest unit yield in the world.
“If the developing countries were to expand their farm output, by 1985, at the annual rate of Israel, the predictable gap between rising demand for foodstuffs and their supply could be bridged and the standard of nutrition considerably raised.
“In the course of time, Israel’s agriculture became more diversified and export-oriented. Apart from citrus, exports of off-season fruit, flowers, and vegetables to European markets shot up by leaps and bounds.
“Yet although the population grew, nutrition improved, and exports of farm produce expanded. Between 1955 and 1970 the proportion of farmers in Israel’s total manpower fell from 17.6 per cent to 10.5 per cent and the value of their output in the GNP fell from 11.8 per cent to 9 per cent. Furthermore, the pace of annual growth of output slowed in the late 1960’s to 3-4 per cent, mainly because of the saturation of the home market; export orientation in produce other than citrus, although expanding, is still only beginning. The scarcity of water is also a limiting factor. The consequence is that industry is now the chief source of any rise in the GNP”. (Note: GNP stands for Gross National Product).
Table No. 1 shows how the irrigated land area has increased; Mr. Horowitz points out that in Israel an irrigated acre can produce crops paying four to five times more than an unirrigated acre. But one must note his reference to “scarcity of water as a limiting factor”. The growth of industry in relation to agricultural development is seen in Table No. 3 which reproduces, in part, figures from The Israel Economy of February 1973.
|
TABLE No. 3 |
||||||
|
COMMODITY EXPORTS ($ million) |
||||||
|
|
1950 |
1955 |
1960 |
1965 |
1970 |
1972 |
|
Industrial Products |
18 |
55 |
154 |
343 |
649 |
945 |
|
Agricultural Products |
17 |
34 |
63 |
86 |
126 |
165 |
Production per Unit, Protective Foods, Water
When viewing accomplishment in “tables of figures” and statistics it is possible to miss the significance of improved efficiency. When the writer stayed for a week in 1945, in the settlement at Ashdod Yaakov, he learned that Dutch Jews from the Netherlands were caring for Holstein cattle whose milk yield per lactation was higher than in the U.K.! In 1969 the reported average yields of milk per cow were 4,890 litres Israel, 4,150 litres Netherlands, 3,330 litres West Germany, 2,225 litres France, 2,830 litres U.K., 800 litres Greece. The yield of wheat in Israel between 1940 and 1969 rose from 300 kilos to 740 kilos per acre of land.
Table No. 4 shows percentage yield increases per unit of land and per cow.
|
TABLE No. 4 |
|
|
INCREASE IN AVERAGE YIELDS OF SELECTED CROPS, 1955-69 |
|
|
Crop (per unit of land) |
Percentage Change |
|
Wheat |
106 |
|
Barley |
69 |
| Sorghum for grain, irrigated |
247 |
| Cotton lint, irrigated |
38 |
| Milk (per cow) |
6 |
|
Source : Central Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Abstract of Israel, 1955-69. |
|
There has been not only the need to increase yields per acre, but also the need to increase financial return. So, under irrigation, vegetables have supplemented milk and eggs to the point where scarcity of water is a limiting factor. The outcome of this agricultural development (beginning in the 1850s with cereals, and grapes for wine, and changing through experience and force of circumstances to citrus and protective foods) is demonstrated by the growth in exports of agricultural products equivalent to 18 million U.S. Dollars in 1950 and 126 million U.S. Dollars in 1970.
Within Israel the nutritional standard has been improved. Coupled with improved medical services, this has lowered the deaths at birth from 47.3 per 1,000 in 1950 to 24.4 per 1,000 in 1971. During this period the Arab population increased from 126,000 (1948) to 458,500 (1972) and Table No. 5, taken from Facts about Israel, shows that their life expectancy increased from 52 to 70 years.
|
TABLE No. 5 |
||
|
ISRAEL’S ARAB MINORITY |
||
|
|
1948 |
1972 |
|
Population |
126,000 |
458,500 |
|
Illiteracy |
95% |
5% |
| School Population |
10,000 |
117,000 |
| University Students |
15 |
1,000 |
| Teachers |
286 |
5,000 |
| Births in Hospitals |
4% |
93% |
| Health Services |
None |
85 Clinics |
|
|
75 Mother-and-Child Health Stations |
|
| Electricity |
Almost none |
92% |
| Agricultural Machines |
5 |
960 |
| Life Expectation |
52 |
70 |
The Druze community has also prospered; whereas Arab and Druze farmers tilled 172,500 acres with only 2,000 acres irrigated in 1948, by 1971 the figures were 234,000 acres with 11,000 acres irrigated; and there were 960 units of agricultural machinery in 1971 compared with 5 in 1948. Jews returning from less-developed areas such as Yemen have similarly benefited from the improved nutrition, and the better health and medical services. The whole period 1950-1970 has shown almost uninterrupted economic growth, and Israel has been a study area for economic theories. Further, Israel has received trainees from Africa, Asia, Latin America, Mediterranean and other areas,, and she has supplied experts for the same areas. In 1971 there were 1,684 trainees in Israel and 414 Israeli experts overseas.
“In the wilderness shall waters break out and streams in the desert”
In the autumn of 1964 the writer attended a conference in New York organised by the American Technion Society. The theme was “Water, Power, and Research”. The first speaker, Mr. A. Melamed (Chief of Water Resources Department, Tahal Water-Planning for Israel Ltd.) stated that “by early 1970’s the growth of domestic and industrial needs will be met only at the expense of reducing the irrigated area”. Both Facts about Israel and David Horowitz confirm the accuracy of this prediction. The forward estimates for consumption of electric power made in 1964 have been shown to be very close to actual.
It was said that by the use of all known sources of water, a total of about 650,000 acres could be irrigated after meeting higher priority demands; that would be about one half the irrigatible land. It was expected that the proposal of 1964 for a power plant (to provide 175 to 200 megawatts of saleable electric power and to produce 100 to 120 million gallons of fresh water) would be approved, but so far finance has not materialised. However, work has commenced on some smaller projects —one serves Eilat—from which data on costs and performance will guide the larger projects which are still needed. The world-wide importance of additional supplies of pure water only serves to raise the significance of this development in Israel.
A great healing of the land has taken place before our eyes after 2,000 years of desolation. It is in accord with all that God promised through the prophets of Israel, 3,000 years ago. It has been accomplished in the face of opposition and war. One might say it confounds economic theory, and defies reason.
Tailpiece
The prophet Ezekiel was one of the many prophets who foretold the return to fruitfulness of the Land of Israel in the latter days. As he prophesied in Chapter 36, this was to come to pass after “the ancient high places” (v. 2) had been taken back from the hands of “the nations that are round about” (v. 5). In the hands of the Arab nations, the Land of Israel would become “desolate wastes” (v. 4), and whereas ten of Moses’s spies disregarded the fruitfulness of the Land in their day and gave an “evil report” of it because of their lack of faith, the Arab tenants would have good cause to speak derisively in later years about the sterility of the Land during their possession of it (compare Num. 13:32 with Ezek. 36:3,4 and 13, RV).
Ezekiel 36 stresses above all that God’s main interest at the time of the fulfilment of the prophecy would be the Land of Israel itself. God’s jealousy was to be for the Land first (v. 5), and only subsequently for the people. But verse 8 clearly, foretells that when this sign of the returning fruitfulness of the Land was given, the people of God would be “at hand to come”; and verses 9-15 depict the peace and blessedness of those who, having been reconciled to God, will forever enjoy the superabundant fruits of the Land (v. 11). The time cannot now be far off when God, having visited His Land and having blessed it with increased prosperity, will “cause men to walk upon (it), even My people Israel” (v. 12). At that time, even the Land itself will “know” that Yahweh is Lord (v. 11), and Israel will not “bear the reproach of the people any more”.
Only a fool would measure trees in terms of money alone . . . forests pay off in so many other ways—they stop soil erosion, help build topsoil, hold back flood waters . . . why, they almost pay their way in re-creation alone !
Sharon Weitz, Forestry Director, Jewish National Fund.
Home |
About
| Subscriptions |
Contact us |
Search
New this month |
Back issues
| Books |
Other
sites | Special Issue index
Back to Special Issue contents